Prediction of Leif Shiras vs Danie Visser Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
L. Shiras vs D. Visser

Leif Shiras

USA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Danie Visser

RSA

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'0" (183 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Left-Handed

Head-to-head: Shiras 2 - 1 Visser

They have played 8 sets in total, with Leif Shiras winning 5 and Danie Visser winning 3. The last match between Danie Visser and Leif Shiras was at the Australian Open, 12-01-1987, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Danie Visser getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Shiras	2
Visser	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R1) Australian Open(01-12-87)

Stats

Danie Visser

Leif Shiras

(R3) Adelaide(12-16-85)

Stats

Leif Shiras

Danie Visser

(R3) Houston(02-25-85)

Stats

Leif Shiras

Danie Visser

L. Shiras vs D. Visser H2H Profile

L. Shiras	Stats	D. Visser
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
48.39% (120-128)	Career Total W/L	44.05% (111-141)
1	Grass	1
1	Indoor	0
3	Titles	1
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

L. Shiras vs D. Visser Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leif Shiras has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Danie Visser has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leif Shiras, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Danie Visser has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Leif Shiras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Danie Visser has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Leif Shiras has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Danie Visser winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Leif Shiras has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 28/28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Danie Visser has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 26% (W/L 6/17).
Player level: In the last year, Leif Shiras has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Danie Visser has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Leif Shiras winning 2 times and Danie Visser being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Leif Shiras winning 5 and Danie Visser winning 3.
The last match between Leif Shiras and Danie Visser was at the Australian Open, 12-01-1987, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with Danie Visser getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leif Shiras has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Danie Visser has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leif Shiras has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Danie Visser has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Leif Shiras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Danie Visser has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Leif Shiras vs Danie Visser Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

L. Shiras vs D. Visser H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

L. Shiras	Stats	D. Visser
2	H2H Matches Won	1
5	Sets Won	3
42	Games Won	39
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	100% (1/1)
67% (2/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
33% (1/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	33% (1/3)

Recent Performance Stats

L. Shiras Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indianapolis - 13-08-1990
R1 Robbie WeissR. Weiss	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R2 Richey RenebergR. Reneberg	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Cincinnati - 06-08-1990
R1 David WheatonD. Wheaton	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Canadian Open - 23-07-1990
R2 Jay BergerJ. Berger	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
R1 Paul AnnaconeP. Annacone	W	6-1 6-4	Stats

View All

D. Visser Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Berlin - 07-10-1991
R1 Udo RiglewskiU. Riglewski	L	7-6(3) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 05-08-1991
R1 Ronald AgenorR. Agenor	W	6-4 3-6 7-6(2)	Stats
R2 Michael ChangM. Chang	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Berlin - 08-10-1990
R2 Milan SrejberM. Srejber	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Franco DavinF. Davin	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

L. Shiras vs D. Visser Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

L. Shiras	Stats	D. Visser
48.39% (120/128)	YTD Win/Loss	44.05% (111/141)
47.10% (300/337)	Sets Win/Loss	46.67% (315/360)
48.56% (3053/3234)	Games Win/Loss	49.16% (3314/3427)
47.11% (57/64)	Hard Win/Loss	45.19% (61/74)
31.25% (5/11)	Clay Win/Loss	26.09% (6/17)
54.55% (30/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	48.00% (12/13)
50.00% (28/28)	Grass Win/Loss	46.38% (32/37)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
0.52	Average Opponent Rank	379.74
36.67% (11/19)	Slam W/L	48.94% (23/24)
31.25% (5/11)	Masters W/L	41.38% (12/17)
43.31% (55/72)	Main Tour W/L	39.31% (57/88)
65.33% (49/26)	Challenger W/L	61.29% (19/12)
51% (109/215)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (85/199)
35% (11/31)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	48% (25/52)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	67% (2/3)
59% (55/94)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (37/89)
81% (116/94)	1st Set Won, Won Match	72% (121/87)
19% (116/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	28% (121/34)
20% (132/26)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (130/23)